Our privacy policy describes how Fidessa uses cookies on our website. If you continue using our website, you are consenting to our use of cookies. OK

Dark Forces

At the beginning of September, BATS Europe announced further extensions to its inverted pricing model to include FTSE 100 stocks. At the same time NASDAQ OMX Europe extended its aggressive rebates, too. The LSE’s approach to these pricing pressures was to abandon its own maker taker price list and revert to its wholesale discount model. This was widely seen as favouring the big banks and brokerages which can generate high volumes but was also seen by some observers as potentially alienating the high frequency boys. This is because these firms specialise in arbitraging between the different maker taker discounts by rapidly moving orders from one venue to another.

At first glance, it looks as if these observers might be right. BATS narrowly beat Turquoise to third place for the FTSE 100 trading and NASDAQ’s volume across all indices exceeded a billion Euros for the first time last week.

Market Share by Venue

Also for the first time, a FTSE 100 stock, Capita Group, has broken through the 3 barrier (FFI 3.06). As with most things, however, it’s never quite that simple. Dig a little deeper and you can see that nearly 45% of the total volume in Capita was traded away from lit order books entirely. In fact, just two trades at Liquidnet accounted for nearly 7% of the entire volume traded that week in Capita.

Market Share by Category

So, maybe darker forces are at work here – it will be interesting to see how it all pans out. The other question that all this poses is what happens when (and if) the new alternative venues revert to normal pricing? Moreover, what is “normal” pricing anyway? Most people agree that one of the causes of fragmentation was that the primary venues lost the initiative with the big banks and brokers. I wonder if the high frequency traders will abandon the MTFs in the same way once all the pricing games have been played out. What might take their place? Maybe, as I wrote about last week, we will see a continuation of the trend whereby market makers or liquidity providers interact with order flow more directly without the need for third party venues at all.

One thing that does seem certain, however, is that everyone needs better information about what is really happening across lit and dark trading as the worlds of venues, brokers, market makers and buy-sides continue to converge through technology.

Leave a comment

Copyright © 2018 Fidessa group plc. All rights reserved.

The information contained within this website is provided for informational purposes only. Fidessa will use reasonable care to ensure that information is accurate at the time it is made available, and for the duration that it remains on the site. The information may be changed by Fidessa at any time without notice. We also reserve the right to close the website at any time. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is given on behalf of Fidessa or any of its respective directors, employees, agents, or advisers as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained herein or its suitability for any purpose and, save in the case of fraud, all liability for direct, indirect, special, consequential or other loss or damages of whatever kind that may arise from use of the website is hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any decisions you make based on the information in this website are your sole responsibility and information on the website should not be relied upon in connection with any investment decision.

The copyright of this website belongs to Fidessa. All other intellectual property rights are reserved.

Fragulator® is a registered trademark of Fidessa group plc.

Reproduction or redistribution of this information is prohibited except with written permission from Fidessa.